INTRODUCING EPS GENERATION 4
Simplicity and Power
Optimizing nearly every aspect of EPS technology – from slurry flow to coil threading to cabinet fabrication – resulted in a simpler EPS Cell that is more efficient and powerful. How powerful? The EPS Generation 4 ‘split’ Turbine Chamber uses HALF as many Slurry Turbines as Generation 3 (4 instead of 8), yet it descales 40% faster than a Gen 3 Turbine Chamber. Part of the reason is Gen 4 delivers 50% more descaling power per turbine !
The simplicity and ‘lightness’ of the Generation 4 design makes it easier to build, install and maintain. That’s important for markets where TMW endorses local third-party manufacture of portions of the Turbine Chamber and Tank by authorized fabricators. It also reduces freight and installation costs.
Weights and Measures
A side-by-side comparison of the Gen 4 EPS Cell with its predecessor Gen 3 design shows the reduction in mass and space achieved.
GEN 3 CELL | GEN 4 CELL | |
---|---|---|
Slurry Turbines | 8 | 4 |
Turbine Chambers | 1 | 2 |
Cell Length | 9.3 meters | 8 meters |
Chamber(s) Weight | 36,200 kg | 12,000 kg |
Chamber(s) Tank Weight | 11,500 kg | 3600 kg |
Chamber(s) Dimensions, LxWxH | 8.5 x 4.5 x 3.8 meters | 3.7 x 4.2 x 3.1 meters |
Tank(s) Dimensions, LxWxH | 5.7 x 4.5 x 3.7 meters | 1.7 x 4.7 x 3.5 meters |
Chamber Pit Depth | 3.8 meters | 2.1 meters |
GEN 3 CELL | GEN 4 CELL | |
---|---|---|
Slurry Turbines | 8 | 4 |
Turbine Chambers | 1 | 2 |
Cell Length | 9.3 meters | 8 meters |
Chamber(s) Weight | 36,200 kg | 12,000 kg |
Chamber(s) Tank Weight | 11,500 kg | 3600 kg |
Chamber(s) Dimensions, LxWxH | 8.5 x 4.5 x 3.8 meters | 3.7 x 4.2 x 3.1 meters |
Tank(s) Dimensions, LxWxH | 5.7 x 4.5 x 3.7 meters | 1.7 x 4.7 x 3.5 meters |
Chamber Pit Depth | 3.8 meters | 2.1 meters |
Generation 4 Improvements
Gen 4 boosts the efficiency of slurry delivery. It provide descaling comparable to Gen 3 with half as many Slurry Turbines. Click on the markersto see how.
Generation 4 Improvements
Gen 4 boosts the efficiency of slurry delivery. It provides descaling comparable to Gen 3 with half as many Slurry Turbines. Click on the tooltip markers below to see how.
ECONOMICS
Gen 4 Averages $12/ton Pickling Cost for Low Carbon
Gen 4 Averages $12/ton Pickling Cost for Low Carbon
Greater Efficiency for Lower Pickling Cost
The Gen 4 design improves the economics of EPS processing in several ways:
- Higher per turbine pickling power boosts line speeds.
- The EPS Scalebreaker boosts line speed over a wider range.
- Reduced maintenance time means more production time.
Taken together, these factors widen the cost advantage that EPS pickling enjoys over acid pickling. That is especially true for difficult-to-descale grades like AHSS, silicon steel and stainless. When processing these grades, EPS line speeds are reduced 25 to 35% compared to pickling low carbon product. But for acid pickling lines, the speeds are typically reduced by 55 to 70%.
Use the EPS COST CALCULATOR to find your EPS pickling cost.
The EPS Scalebreaker
Beginning with Generation 4, EPS Cells will be accompanied by the EPS Scalebreaker. This compact, cost-effective unit increases EPS Line speed by as much as 35% for material between 1. 5 mm to 5.7 mm (0.060 to .225 inch), making it an essential component of the EPS Coil Line.
The EPS Scalebreaker has no bridle rolls and is a fraction of the size and cost of tension levelers used in acid pickling lines to break scale. Because of its unique roll configuration, our pull-through EPS Scalebreaker allows us to use only a maximum of 11,000 kg of recoiler tension, completely eliminating the need for large, expensive powered bridle rolls. This patented scalebreaker produces very flat strip (see details), and includes an anti-crossbow station to remove crossbow in the strip as a result of the scale breaking.
A Better Bottom Line
Gen 4’s more efficient slurry flow and greater power per Turbine creates savings.
The table below shows how a 1-Cell Gen 4 EPS line (4 Turbines total) compares to a 1-Cell Gen 3 EPS line (8 Turbines total).
One Cell Gen 4 EPS Line Compared to One Cell Gen 3 EPS Line | |
---|---|
Line Speed | 40% Faster |
Production: Tons/Month | 34% Greater* |
Consumables Cost (grit, filter media, etc.) | 50% Less |
Wear Items Cost (turbine Blades, grit valves, etc.) | 49% Less |
Electric Cost | 45% Less |
Cell Maintenance Downtime | 27% Less |
Two Gen 4 EPS Cells Compared to One Gen 3 EPS Cell | |
---|---|
Line Speed | 50% Faster |
Production: Tons/Month | 36% Greater* |
Consumables Cost (grit, filter media, etc.) | 32% Less |
Wear Items Cost (turbine Blades, grit valves, etc.) | 27% Less |
Electricity Cost | 5% More |
Cell Maintenance Downtime | 20% Less |
Line Length | 20% Greater |
OPERATIONS
Simpler Operations and Maintenance
EPS Gen 4 line operation retains the simplicity of previous generations, with featues like automatic grit feed and closed loop line speed control based on real-time scale level feedback. Line startup and shutdown are fast, coil loading and threading can be fully automatic, and operators can learn the system in a few days.
Gen 4 maintenance requirements are reduced from previous versions. The smaller, simpler Turbine Chamber provides easier access to maintenance points. The elimination of thread bars and passline rolls removed time-consuming maintenance procedures. And with Gen 4, nearly all maintenance is performed outside of the Turbine Chamber and Tank, so an individual Cell can be locked out for maintenance while the remaining Cells and the EPS line continue to run.
Material Feeding and Threading
The split Turbine Chamber design features two narrow spans to thread material across, instead of one wide span. This greatly simplifies coil threading. Click on image ‘EPS Gen 4 Threading System’ below and you’ll see it consists of only fixed support bars and entry/exit pinch rolls.
By contrast, the Gen 3 Cell required powered, active thread bars and internal passline rolls to reliably feed the strip across the wide Turbine Chamber. Click on the ‘EPS Gen 3 Threading System’ image to see details. These active components required power, actuators, motors and maintenance.
The Gen 4 Cell at TMW does employ a coil stitcher as an additional measure to keep threading fast and error-free.
Material Feeding and Threading
The split Turbine Chamber design features two narrow spans to thread material across, instead of one wide span. This greatly simplifies coil threading. Click on image ‘EPS Gen 4 Threading System’ below and you’ll see it consists of only fixed support bars and entry/exit pinch rolls.
By contrast, the Gen 3 Cell required powered, active thread bars and internal passline rolls to reliably feed the strip across the wide Turbine Chamber. Click on the ‘EPS Gen 3 Threading System’ image to see details. These active components required power, actuators, motors and maintenance.
The Gen 4 Cell at TMW does employ a coil stitcher as an additional measure to keep threading fast and error-free.
The Gen 4 material feeding and threading is not only faster and more reliable, it reduces downtime for Cell maintenance. With EPS Gen 3, thread fingers had to be inspected weekly and replaced regularly, requiring entry into the Turbine Chamber with the line shut down. That, combined with maintenance of thread bar and internal passline roll systems, accounted for 14% of line downtime. The Gen 4 design restores that lost time to production.
EPS Gen 4 Pickling Line Configuration
The photo below is the first EPS Gen 4 Pickling Line at TMW. Mouse over anymarker below to see the individual components of the line. Note that any component labeled ‘NEW’ was added specifically to optimize line performance with the Gen 4 EPS Cell.
GET INFO
Your Invitation: Explore EPS Gen 4
Gen 4 has taken interest in EPS Technology to new levels. We are now conducting demonstration tours of our Gen 4 EPS Pickling Line, running trial coils and responding to proposal requests. What is your interest?
Please complete and submit the form below, and a TMW associate will answer your questions and requests promptly.
* indicates required field